Freedom New Zealand

The anti-terror raids of October 15 resulted in the seizure of only four
weapons and 230 rounds of ammunition that have led to charges.
So with that in mind, they were not conducted by the N.Z Security
Intelligence Services, but police and four weapons will not suffice for
a war against the country like the governmental forces along with media
falsely portrayed to us all. The targets were never the NZ people,
rather the government.

This can be led to a conclusion of, this can be used by the system to
subliminally market the terrorism law or bill or whatever rubbish you
wish to call it, and use it against any person in N.Z like the the
Corporation of the United States has.
No one in this country would intelligently without coercion, understand
this bill, act and most other statues and laws. If they did, rest assure
they would not consent to it. If anything they would be joining the
protesters outside parliament.

This piece of law or bill, is much like the Street Racers bill, which
can now target any driver with an unregistered car and deem to apply
them under a offence of street racing, it's bullshit.
I have various proof of this recently, in one case a police dog handler
impounded a car under the Act -though the car was not modified and he
called them a street racer for going 12k's over the speed limit, the
rego was 33 days over. Damn revenue gathering trickery when laws are
passed time and time again without specific definition and just expect
any person to comply or else. This is not true representative democracy.

Back to the early-morning raids which involved more than 300 officers.
Good way to waste time and money to add note.

The police have not said what they seized in the property searches in
Auckland, Waikato, the Bay of Plenty, Wellington and Christchurch using
warrants alleging crimes under the Terrorism Suppression Act and have
declined a request to do so.

But of 16 people charged with firearms offences, items seized on October
15 are the basis of charges against only two - Tame Iti, and a man who
has name suppression.

Logically four weapons could do a small-medium sized bank robbery or
less, but war and assassination? That's utter bullshit and any actions
under the terrorism bill or supposed to be new law is unjustified and
denies the rights and freedoms for those involved in the police
harassment ordeal, including martial law like tatics by ski-mask fully
automatic armed storm-trooper police.
The only terrorism was done is by the police. Instilling fear and terror
into a group of children and communities, re the bus storm-boarding like
ruthless pirates.

It has been revealed in the mainstream that the charges Tame Iti faces
include illegal possession on that date of three rifles - a Ruger, a
Siga and a Machtech - while the other man is charged in regard to a
Ruger rifle and 100 rounds of .22 calibre bullets and 130 rounds of .303
calibre ammunition.

Most people in rural communities with a gun will have .22 and/or .303
style firearms for hunting, as also the comment from one of the friends
of those arrested and detained by police during the raids. As proved by
protests all around the country, these people are activists, not terrorists.

So these hunters, which now surfaces a story one was a off-duty police
officer, which found the so-called training camps, came to the
conclusion of a mass training ground for terrorists, when these
activists could of possibly had the same style of firearms the hunters had.
Adding to this a napalm bomb was found said most of the mainstream media
initially, however for public safety police would have to (as they, high
ranking pork-chop Broad said thats what this raid was based on) disarm
the bomb, they never said at any point 'ingredients or partial materials
for a bomb' - I will hold them to those words.

The last arguement is no real threat assessment seems to be performed
here by an expert if anyone.

The mainstream comments to say:
Many of the 16 are charged jointly with up to 12 others and the dates
the offences are alleged to have occurred relate to dates of the alleged
training camps in the Ureweras. The earliest charges relate to November
2006.

The Crown predominantly appears to rely on evidence from surveillance of
the camps and interception of conversations. While the latter would be
admissible for charges under the Terrorism Suppression Act, it is
unlikely to be for firearms charges.

Meanwhile, the Solicitor-General says he has no plans to provide a
detailed assessment of flaws he identified in the Terrorism Suppression
Act, which he said was "almost impossible to apply in a coherent manner".