Freedom New Zealand: Urewera 16

Welcome to Freedom New Zealand.

A New Zealand based blog publishing information about cover-ups by big business, politics and the like. Thinking outside the pyramid of enslavement.

Quote: The amount of truth you know equals the amount of freedom you have to use that information as a weapon against the oppressor, Red Pill - Admin of this blog.

To login or for more options click the 'options' menu located to the top left of the site. You don't need a Google Account to comment and respond to any post. We may not support all views, material or opinions of any external linked sites, blogs and or similar.

Showing posts with label Urewera 16. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urewera 16. Show all posts

Urewera Activists: Gang Charges Under Fire

⊆ 09:13 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

The decision to lay new charges against five of the Urewera activists has been described as "ludicrous" by supporters of the defendants.

Global Peace and Justice spokesman John Minto said authorities had "failed to brand" the activists as terrorists so the charges were nothing more than an attempt to "brand them as criminals".

Tame Iti, Emily Bailey, Urs Signer, Tuhoi Lambert and Whiri Kemara are all expected to be charged within the next few weeks with participating in a criminal gang.

The charge, which carries a maximum penalty of five years' imprisonment, will be added to firearm charges the individuals are already facing.

Those charges were laid more than a year ago against 17 people who were alleged to have participated in weapons-training camps around the country.

Police had originally wanted to charge the group under the Terrorism Suppression Act but that was not allowed by the Solicitor-General, who said the legislation was flawed.

Yesterday, politicians were reluctant to comment on the new charges. Prime Minister Helen Clark and National leader John Key had no comment to make, while Police Minister Annette King said the first she knew about it was when she read the story in the Herald yesterday morning.

Iti said he had been told not to talk to the media about the latest charges and referred all queries to his lawyer, Annette Sykes. Ms Sykes did not return the Weekend Herald's calls.

"Why lay these charges more than a year after the arrests?" asked Mr Minto। "It seems the police will leave no stone unturned in trying to make the case look more serious than it is and in the process to salvage some credibility from the hopeless mess they have got themselves into."


- NZ Herald

 

Urewera raids: Accused face fresh charges

⊆ 08:55 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

Fresh charges are to be laid against some of those seized in the Urewera police raids - more than a year after they were arrested.

Five of the 18 people arrested during the nationwide operation last October are to face new allegations of participating in a criminal gang.

One of the five is Maori activist Tame Iti.

The charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and has angered supporters of the accused, who claim the Government is trying to save face after failing in an attempt to bring charges under the Terrorism Suppression Act.

Seventeen of the 18 defendants charged with firearms offences were committed to trial last month.

They were alleged to have participated in weapons-training camps at various locations around the country.

But the Crown has added new charges of participating in a criminal gang in a draft indictment sent to lawyers of five of the accused.

The new charge would be laid under section 98A of the Crimes Act and is expected to be added to the list of charges the five already face.

Because it is more serious than the firearms charges, it will have to be heard in the High Court.

A group called Justice Now Collective, which is supporting the accused and their families, last night reacted angrily to the new charges saying they were "a desperate attempt by the Government to save face after the Solicitor-General found insufficient evidence to bring charges under the Terrorism Suppression Act".

Police originally wanted to charge all of the accused with offences under the Terrorism Suppression Act but that was not allowed by Solicitor-General David Collins, QC, who said the legislation was flawed.

Instead police laid firearms-related charges under the Arms Act.

All but one of the 18 who were originally charged were committed to trial on those charges at a depositions hearing in the Auckland District Court last month.

More than 300 charges were heard at that hearing.

Some charges, relating to three of the alleged camps, were dismissed by Judge Mark Perkins, who found there was insufficient evidence to support them.

But Crown Prosecutor Ross Burns said last night the crown would be re-laying those charges in the same indictment with the new charges.

Justice Now Collective spokeswoman Sally Darity criticised that decision.

"This is part of a systematic attack on Maori communities," she said.

"The Government's support of the war on terrorism in the passage of a raft of anti-terrorism laws and expanded police and Security Intelligence Service budgets confirm their agenda to control the population through surveillance and brutal repression of any genuine dissent."

The Crown is entitled to reinstate charges if it believes there is sufficient evidence to support them, as not all available evidence is presented at a depositions hearing.

The other four defendants facing the new charge are Emily Bailey, Urs Signer, Tuhoi Lambert and Whiri Kemara.

A YEAR ON
* October 15, 2007: Police raid several properties including suspected weapons-training camps. Several people are arrested on firearms charges, with the possibility of more serious charges being laid under anti-terrorism laws.
* November 8, 2007: Solicitor General David Collins, QC, rules against the police's application to charge the accused under the Terrorism Suppression Act.
* October 17, 2008: Charges are dropped against one of the accused, Rongomai Pero Bailey. The remaining 17 are on bail awaiting trial.
* October 28: After a month of depositions hearings, the Crown issues an indictment charging five of the accused with participation in a criminal gang under the Crimes Act.


- NZ Herald

 

Urewera 17 - Committed To Trial

⊆ 14:25 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

All but one of the 18 defendants charged with firearms offences following nationwide police raids last October have been committed to trial.

But one defendant, Rongomai Bailey, was discharged after Judge Mark Perkins said there was insufficient evidence to bring him to trial.

Judge Perkins told the Auckland District Court however there was sufficient evidence to bring the 17 others to trial.

Those 17 have been remanded on bail until a callover in the Auckland District Court on February 17, 2009 - at which they will not have to appear.

There was a heavy police presence at the court with supporters of the accused carrying banners outside the building.

Outside the court, Rongomai Bailey said he was relieved the firearms charges against him had been dropped. He said he would now head back to his farm to grow some vegetables and "chill out".

Mr Bailey would not comment on what was happening in the Ureweras and the so-called "training camps" because "it could be taken out of context".

Mr Bailey also criticised police, describing those still facing charges as "victims of police over-imagination".

He said there were a lot of negative connotations and he has found it hard getting a job.

"If anyone Googles my name it comes up in association with terror trials, terror files, terror camps and I don't even know how I could ever go to the States, they've got a terrorist watchlist of about 800,000 people," he said.

Mr Bailey's brother and sister - Ira and Emily Bailey - will stand trial. He said it depressed him to know that his friends and members of his family were still facing firearms charges.

"It's been a long year and it's been really hard to get a job where I live in the Coromandel and come up to the court case."

 

Police deliver TradeMe private details names to prisoners

⊆ 06:33 by Red Pill | ˜ 3 responses »

The private details of up to 10,000 Trade Me users - described as a "shopping list for criminals" - have been released by police to prison inmates.

Police investigating the so-called terror raids last year obtained the information of the innocent traders as evidence. They then passed the disclosure material to defence lawyers and, in one case, to the prison cell of Jamie Lockett.

One of the "Urewera 16" arrested on firearms charges, Lockett received 16 boxes containing 24,000 pages of information relating to the police case against him, according to this week's Listener.

One of the boxes contained the personal details of up to 10,000 Trade Me customers, including their name, user name, personal email address, phone numbers, home address and trading history over the past five years.

One trader, whose details were passed on to Lockett, recently bought an AK-47 military assault rifle and 100 rounds of ammunition and other firearms, including target rifles.

A mother-of-three, whose trading history includes My Little Pony books and has no connection to the Urewera 16, was horrified her details were in the police paperwork.

"It certainly makes me think twice about Trade Me," she told the Listener. "I can understand the police going for a search warrant, but I think they have given them far too much. I'm quite shocked by it all, particularly the channels it came through."

Trade Me and police were yesterday non-specific over who was responsible for releasing the details of the thousands of innocent traders.

Trade Me security manager Dean Winter said the company had no choice in what information it gave to police. The popular Kiwi auction site was merely a witness in the investigation and had no control over the information once it had been passed on, Winter said.

"We were served with a search warrant, and we complied with the search warrant. We didn't have a choice whether we thought the information was relevant or not."

Winter said it was disappointing the information had been passed on by police to the accused.

"I think lawyers should take more responsibility for the information they receive under disclosure in some circumstances," the former detective said. They need to take responsibility for its security. Handing it on to the accused is a bit silly in some cases."

Detective Sergeant Aaron Pascoe, of the police Special Investigation Group, refused to comment on what information had been requested from Trade Me and why.

He also refused to comment on why so many traders' details had been requested, thousands of whom are unconnected to the Urewera case, rather than only those specific to the investigation. "We are required to disclose any information that is potentially relevant to a defence lawyer," Pascoe said.

"The rules I am bound by are to ensure we have a trial that is not impacted by a lack of disclosure."

It is standard legal practice for the prosecution to provide the defence with any discovery information relevant to its case.

Defence lawyers are given masses of paperwork from police on behalf of their clients, who also have the right to view the information.

Danny Toresen, chief operating officer of private investigation firm Paragon New Zealand, said that the traders' information could serve as a "shopping list" for criminals in the wrong hands.

An enterprising criminal could copy the information and sell it to underworld figures, said Toresen, then homes could be put under surveillance and burglars could target specific items. "The important correlation in the information is the goods to an address," he said. "As a shopping list, it has value."

A spokeswoman for Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff said the incident raised "significant concerns" but she would not comment further because the matter was before the courts.


- Source