Freedom New Zealand: swine flu

Welcome to Freedom New Zealand.

A New Zealand based blog publishing information about cover-ups by big business, politics and the like. Thinking outside the pyramid of enslavement.

Quote: The amount of truth you know equals the amount of freedom you have to use that information as a weapon against the oppressor, Red Pill - Admin of this blog.

To login or for more options click the 'options' menu located to the top left of the site. You don't need a Google Account to comment and respond to any post. We may not support all views, material or opinions of any external linked sites, blogs and or similar.

Showing posts with label swine flu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label swine flu. Show all posts

The Truth about the Flu Shot - Infowars.com

⊆ 13:56 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

If the government mandates a series of flu shots this fall — so far they are only "recommending" the shots — you can expect to get a dose of thimerosal (mercury), formaldehyde, detergent, MF-59 (an oil-based adjuvant), and other toxins.

Incidentally, if you believe the government will not kidnap you at gunpoint and lock you in a concentration camp and possibly force you to take these toxins, check out Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003. It states that the government has the authority to establish "regulations providing for the apprehension, detention, or conditional release of individuals to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of suspected communicable diseases," including diseases at that time "not yet isolated or named."

Of course, the government will decide if you have a deadly disease or not.

http://www.infowars.com/misc/the_truth_about_the_flu_shot.pdf

- Source


 

Prime Minister and Special Epidemic Powers

⊆ 20:47 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

I think someone forgot about the Epidemic Preparedness Bill, anyway the NZPA and NZ Herald report as below....


Ministry says no need for Key to trigger special epidemic powers

Health officials say they have no plans for Prime Minister John Key to issue an "epidemic notice" - a key legal step to trigger special powers for regional medical officers of health.

"The illness that this pandemic is causing is not severe enough to warrant the use of the powers that issuing the notice would permit," Fran McGrath, deputy director of public health told NZPA.

A total of 127 cases has been confirmed in New Zealand, up 18 from 109 yesterday, and 105 of them are current cases.

There are also 20 probable cases.

The cumulative total of confirmed cases by region are:

Auckland 42, Waikato 4, Bay of Plenty/Lakes 3, Hawke's Bay 1, Wanganui/Palmerston North 1, Wellington 27, Nelson/Marlborough 1 and Canterbury 30.

Under an epidemic notice, authorised by the prime minister, regional medical officers of health have the power to:

* Require people to submit to medical examination or testing at specified times and places;

* Require persons, places, buildings, ships, vehicles, aircraft, animals or things to be tested, isolated, quarantined or disinfected as they think fit;

* Restrict the movement of people and vehicles;

* Set up emergency hospitals;

* Restrict public gatherings;

* Close any premises, except for Parliament and private homes;

* Call on police to use reasonable force if they need that to carry out their duties.

Dr McGrath said the current priority was containment of the virus, which was estimated to have a "reproductive value" of 1.4, which meant that every two people who fell ill were expected to transmit the disease to three other people.

"Increased spread of the virus could overwhelm the health services during the already busy winter season," she said.

"While the virus in the main causes moderate illness in most people, there is an increased risk for some groups such as those with a chronic disease and pregnancy."

The country was still in a "containment phase", she said.

Containment involved both border management and stamping out clusters of the virus spread.

Doctors were telling arriving travellers that only people with flu-like symptoms within four days of overseas travel were now considered to be at risk of having the swine flu form of the A(H1N1) virus.

But as more cases were confirmed in the community the focus would shift to boosting the way care was provided in the community, Dr McGrath said.

Planning for this "manage it" phase provided for community-based health services to manage large numbers of people with influenza as well as maintain services for patients with other illnesses.

As much as 30 per cent of the population was expected to contract the swine flu, but the symptoms, which included fever, coughing, a sore throat and often diarrhoea, disappeared after about five days.

In this "manage it" phase, many people would be sent home to look after themselves - in the same way they would with seasonal flu.

They would be told to stay home for seven days after the start of symptoms or until they have been symptom-free for 24 hours - whichever was longer.

Health officials expected most ill New Zealanders would be able to nurse themselves at home, though an Australian expert has warned asthma and A(H1N1) flu were a potentially deadly mix.

Dr Matthew Peters, head of respiratory medicine at a Sydney Hospital, said chronic heart or lung disease and diabetes were common ailments that could dramatically escalate the risk posed by the virus.

"Around 40 per cent of admissions to hospital with swine flu-related illnesses in the US have been in people with asthma," he said.

Asked to what extent the ministry was looking to the two-week school holidays due to start on July 3 as a potential "firebreak" in reducing the rate of community transmission, Dr McGrath said the school holidays "may be very useful as a break".

Link

- NZPA

 

Isolation, fines for swine flu law breaches

⊆ 07:31 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

People who defy medical health officers' beefed-up swine-flu isolation powers risk being fined and forcibly detained.

The Government on Monday added swine flu to the list of notifiable diseases.

This allows people who have been in contact with patients who have swine flu to be compulsorily isolated at home, and pupils and teachers who are patients or contacts to be excluded from schools.

These measures are in addition to the general powers of medical officers of health under the Health Act 1956 to isolate people considered at risk of spreading swine flu.

A person who disobeys medical officers' orders faces a $500 fine, plus $50 for each further day of non-compliance.

But it is more likely the officer would invoke the power in section 79 (4) of the act to "detain him, by force if necessary".

Anyone who leaves their specified place of isolation is liable to be "arrested by any officer of the Ministry of Health or by any member of the staff of the hospital or other place of isolation or by any constable, without warrant" and taken to the place of isolation.

As well, medical officers of health gain much wider powers - such as restricting travel, closing businesses and banning meetings - if the Prime Minister issues an epidemic notice, the Minister of Health gives authority or a state of emergency is declared.

Then the penalty for disobeying a medical officer of health's directions rises to a maximum of six months' jail and a fine up to $4000.

The director of public health, Dr Mark Jacobs, said yesterday the Health Ministry's preference was voluntarily compliance and that was working well.

"If we had a problem with that, our fall-back wouldn't be to take them to court and fine them. It would be to enforce isolation, because the purpose of this is public health.

"Public health is not served by fining them."

The preference was to isolate people at home, or at hospital if necessary, he said.

Asked if police cells could be used, he said it was "unlikely but is in theory a possibility."

And he said it was unlikely the powers triggered by ministerial order or emergency declaration would be needed, even if swine flu - influenza, A (H1N1) - spread widely.

It has been contained in New Zealand; the tally of confirmed cased yesterday was 17.

Worldwide, more than 25,000 cases, including 139 deaths, have been reported. Australia's total has passed 1200 cases, mostly in Victoria, and is rising rapidly.

A group of Gisborne Boys' High school students who travelled home from a school trip to Brisbane on Sunday were yesterday isolated at school for the day.

Those with flu symptoms were given Tamiflu and asked to stay at home in isolation. The group includes 16 students, two teachers and a parent.

* The price of disobedience

$500 fine for refusing to be isolated.

$50 for every day of continued refusal.

Detention by force if necessary.

 

Refreshing the Epidemic Preparedness Bill

⊆ 11:55 by Red Pill | ˜ 0 responses »

Swine Flu? geez, i knew this horseshit was coming a long time ago, but again the label of Conspiracy Theory was set by the critics.

Really, lets look at what 'flu-like symptoms' really can be defined as, because it allows an abuse of power to be honest.
One report even confirmed this;

"They were treated and are being kept in isolation at a secret location."
Treated with what? TamiFlu? Yeah right!

Looking back at the Epidemic Preparedness Bill, here's a refresh on what even less power and freedom you have as a person.



Clause 19 amends sect.71 of the Health Act 1956 to allow Medical Officers with clear power to requisition land, building, food, drink, clothing, bedding, tents, and vechiles private or public.

This also allow under Sect.71a to allow police officers to use force if neccessary to assist Medical Officers performing powers under any sections under sect 70 or 71a.

This also includes police allowing to prevent people from any obstruction or hindering to this.

Subsection (2) allow police to enter any land, building, vechile, aircraft or ship, also to stop, inspect it or anything on it or in it.

A minimum of 6 months prison or $4000 fine or both is deemed onto any person violating this or refusing to comply with this.

http://www.nzmj.com/journal/119-1240/2124/ commented
"powers of compulsory medical examination [Section 70 (1) (e) of the Health Act] and detention powers through the use of isolation and quarantine [Section 70 (1) (f)]."

"Section 79 of the Health Act 1956, a provision devoid of any inbuilt right to appeal or review, has been used on several occasions to detain people suffering from infectious disease. The most notable cases were of two HIV-positive men detained under this Section in 1999."

Other sources include;

Bill 39-1 [PDF 1505k]
http://www.parliament.nz/NR/rdonlyres/ECC2E57D-4364-414F-854F-07CC828B75B9/87906/DBHOH_BILL_7251_12499999.pdf

Bill 39-2 [PDF 286k]
http://www.parliament.nz/NR/rdonlyres/ECC2E57D-4364-414F-854F-07CC828B75B9/87907/DBHOH_BILL_7251_392992.pdf